Our law firm serves clients in Grand Rapids, Kalamazoo and throughout southwest Michigan.

What Evidence Is Needed for a DUI Conviction in Michigan?

Facing a DUI (or OWI) charge in Michigan can be overwhelming. You may wonder: What evidence is needed for a DUI conviction in Michigan?

To secure a DUI conviction, prosecutors need evidence demonstrating you were operating a vehicle while your ability to drive was impaired due to alcohol or drugs. This can include observations by the arresting officer, chemical test results, field sobriety tests, and witness statements.

As an experienced DUI defense attorney, I’ve defended countless clients facing charges by challenging the evidence presented against them. In this article, I’ll explain the types of evidence prosecutors use, what must be proven, and how a skilled attorney can help protect your rights.

 

A Michigan DUI attorney discussing a drunk driving breath or blood test performed by a police officer and the legal limit.

 

What Must Be Proven for a DUI Conviction in Michigan?

For a DUI conviction, the prosecution must establish three critical elements:

  1. You were operating a vehicle.
    • “Operating” includes driving or being in physical control of a vehicle.
    • Simply being in the driver’s seat with the keys in the ignition may qualify as operating under Michigan law.
  2. You were intoxicated or impaired.
    • Prosecutors must show that alcohol, drugs, or a combination impaired your ability to drive safely.
  3. Intoxication was caused by alcohol or drugs.
    • Evidence must link your impairment to substances in your system.
    • Did the Driver Knowingly Consume Alcohol or Drugs?
      • To secure a DUI conviction, prosecutors may also need to demonstrate that you knowingly consumed alcohol or drugs. Unintentional consumption or being unknowingly impaired can impact the prosecution’s case.Examples include:
        • Unintentional Consumption: Accidentally consuming a spiked drink at a party or a mislabeled product containing alcohol.
        • Prescription Medications: Drivers who take prescription drugs without knowing their potential side effects on driving ability.

💡 For more details on the legal definition of OWI, see the Michigan Compiled Laws Section 257.625.

 

Types of Evidence Used in DUI Cases

Prosecutors rely on various forms of evidence to prove intoxication. Here’s what they commonly present in court:

1. Observations by Law Enforcement

Arresting officers document your behavior and physical appearance during the traffic stop. This can include:

  • Erratic driving: Swerving, speeding, or failure to obey traffic signals.
  • Physical signs of intoxication: Bloodshot eyes, slurred speech, or the odor of alcohol.
  • Incriminating statements: Admissions of drinking or using drugs.

2. Field Sobriety Tests (FSTs)

Field sobriety tests are physical and cognitive exercises used to assess impairment. Common tests include:

  • Horizontal Gaze Nystagmus (HGN): Evaluates eye movements for signs of intoxication.
  • Walk-and-Turn: Assesses balance and coordination.
  • One-Leg Stand: Tests focus, balance, and motor skills.

💡 Note: Field sobriety tests are subjective and may be challenged in court due to improper administration or external factors like uneven surfaces.

3. Chemical Test Results

Chemical tests provide measurable evidence of intoxication. Michigan law sets the following limits:

  • Blood Alcohol Content (BAC):
    • 0.08% or higher for drivers 21 and older.
    • 0.02% or higher for drivers under 21.
    • 0.04% or higher for commercial drivers.
  • Drug Testing: Blood or urine tests detect controlled substances.

4. Breathalyzer Results

Breath tests estimate Blood Alcohol Content by measuring alcohol in your breath. However, these results can be challenged if:

  • The device wasn’t properly calibrated.
  • The test wasn’t administered correctly.

5. Witness Statements

Witnesses, such as passengers or bystanders, may provide testimony regarding your behavior before or during the traffic stop.

6. Video and Dashcam Footage

Police vehicles are often equipped with dashcams that record traffic stops. Video evidence can show your driving behavior, interactions with the officer, and FST performance.

For more information, read Impact of the New Standardized Field Sobriety Test .

 

An attorney working on a drunk driving charge involving reasonable doubt, a breath or blood test, driver's license suspension, and a DUI arrest.

 

How Technology and Human Error Affect DUI Evidence

While breathalyzers and chemical tests are critical in DUI cases, they are not immune to error. Here’s how technology and human error can undermine the reliability of this evidence:

  1. Breathalyzer Calibration Issues
    • Breathalyzers must be regularly calibrated and maintained. A device that hasn’t been properly serviced can produce inaccurate BAC readings.
  2. Operator Error
    • Improper administration of tests—such as incorrect timing or failing to follow protocols—can invalidate results.
  3. Software or Hardware Malfunctions
    • Older breathalyzer models or software glitches can yield unreliable data.
  4. External Interference
    • Substances like mouthwash or certain medications can cause false positives.

💡 Did You Know? A 2019 investigation revealed widespread calibration errors in breathalyzer machines, leading to dismissed DUI cases in several states.

 

Fight Back With D.G. Moore
Aggressive Defense When You Need It Most
Don't let one mistake define your life. Call now.

How Can DUI Evidence Be Challenged in Michigan?

DUI evidence isn’t always as reliable as it seems, and there are many ways to challenge its validity. An experienced attorney can identify and exploit weaknesses in the prosecution’s case. Here’s how:

  1. Challenging the Traffic Stop
    Police must have reasonable suspicion to pull you over. If they lacked valid justification, the stop—and any resulting evidence—may be deemed inadmissible.
  2. Disputing Field Sobriety Tests (FSTs)
    Field sobriety tests are subjective and influenced by external factors, such as:

    • Uneven road surfaces.
    • Medical conditions or physical impairments.
    • Improper administration by the officer.
  3. Questioning Breathalyzer or Chemical Test Results
    Chemical tests are often the cornerstone of DUI cases, but they’re not foolproof. Common challenges include:

    • Device Issues: Breathalyzers require regular calibration and maintenance. Improper handling can skew results.
    • Health Conditions: Diabetes, acid reflux, or other medical issues can falsely elevate BAC readings.
  4. Contesting Officer Observations
    Physical signs like bloodshot eyes or slurred speech may have alternative explanations, such as fatigue, allergies, or stress.
  5. Exposing Procedural Errors
    Errors in how evidence was collected, processed, or documented can render it inadmissible. For example:

    • Failure to read your Miranda rights.
    • Mishandling or losing evidence.

💡 Tip: A skilled attorney can also bring in expert witnesses to question the reliability of breathalyzer devices, FSTs, or chemical testing procedures.

 

An attorney discussing DUI prosecutor's evidence like breath or blood test, visibly impaired beyond a reasonable doubt or operating while visibly impaired.

 

Comparing Michigan DUI Penalties

If convicted, DUI penalties can vary depending on whether it’s a first, second, or third offense.

Offense License Suspension Fines Jail Time
First Offense Up to 6 months $100–$500 Up to 93 days
Second Offense Minimum 1 year $200–$1,000 5 days to 1 year
Third Offense Minimum 5 years $500–$5,000 1 to 5 years

This table provides a clear comparison of penalties by offense, helping readers quickly understand the potential consequences of a DUI conviction.

 

Why Hiring a DUI Defense Attorney Is Critical

A DUI conviction can have lasting consequences on your life. Here’s how a defense attorney can help:

1. Evaluate the Evidence

Your attorney will scrutinize the prosecution’s evidence for flaws or procedural errors.

2. Suppress Unlawfully Obtained Evidence

If the traffic stop or arrest violated your constitutional rights, your attorney can file motions to exclude evidence.

3. Negotiate Reduced Penalties

A skilled attorney can negotiate plea deals, reduced charges, or alternative sentencing, such as probation or treatment programs.

 

Contact D.G. Moore Attorney at Law Today

Don’t let a DUI conviction dictate your future. At D.G. Moore Attorney at Law, I have the experience and determination to fight for your rights and challenge questionable evidence. Call 269-808-8007 today or schedule a free, no-obligation consultation to start building a strong defense. The sooner you act, the stronger your case will be.

Related Content:

Secure Your Defense Today
Free Initial Consultation Available
Start with the best defense strategy. Speak to us first.

FAQs About Evidence in Michigan DUI Cases

  • What counts as evidence in a DUI case?
    Evidence includes officer observations, field sobriety test results, chemical tests (breath, blood, or urine), and witness statements.
  • Can breathalyzer results be wrong?
    Yes, breathalyzer results can be inaccurate due to improper calibration, medical conditions, or errors in administration
  • Can a lawyer get DUI charges dismissed in Michigan?
    Yes, if your attorney can prove procedural errors, lack of probable cause, or flawed evidence, your charges could be reduced or dismissed.
  • Do I have to take a field sobriety test?
    No, you can refuse a field sobriety test, but refusal may raise suspicion and could still lead to arrest.
  • Is video evidence always used in DUI cases?
    Not always, but dashcam footage, if available, can be pivotal in challenging the officer’s account or verifying the circumstances of the arrest.

David G. Moore is a highly experienced criminal defense attorney in Michigan. With a Juris Doctor from Thomas M. Cooley Law School and experience as a former assistant prosecutor, he brings unique insights to his practice. David’s career spans the entire spectrum of criminal defense, from minor infractions to complex felonies.

He has successfully handled cases in state and federal courts, including pre-indictment investigations, jury trials, and appeals. Licensed in Michigan and Arizona, David’s approach combines mitigation efforts with intense litigation preparation. His diverse legal experience has established him as a trusted and authoritative voice in Michigan’s legal community.

Recent Posts

Archives

Archives

Categories

Categories

RSS Feed

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Do you have a matter with which our lawyers can help you?

Get a Free, No-obligation Consultation